Paddle Autogrow Memory Allocation Crash on GPU-Manager
Problem Description
Symptoms
When both PaddlePaddle's Autogrow memory allocation strategy and GPU-Manager's virtualized memory management are enabled simultaneously, the following anomalies may occur:
- OOM errors due to discontinuous memory allocation
- Abnormal GPU utilization fluctuations
- Random training process crashes
- Inconsistent memory usage between nvidia-smi reports and framework statistics
Root Cause
Root Cause Analysis
-
Memory Allocation Strategy Conflict
Paddle's Autogrow uses dynamic segmented allocation while GPU-Manager's virtualization requires contiguous physical memory mapping
-
Management Mechanism Incompatibility
Autogrow's delayed release mechanism conflicts with GPU-Manager's memory reclamation strategy
-
Metadata Maintenance Conflict
Separate metadata maintenance by both systems causes inconsistent memory views
Trigger Mechanism:
- Autogrow attempts optimal block sizing during allocation
- GPU-Manager virtualization layer intercepts physical memory requests
- Non-contiguous allocations cause virtual address mapping failures
- Dual management leads to metadata consistency exceptions
Solution
Solution Overview
Force Paddle to use traditional allocation strategy via environment variable:
FLAGS_allocator_strategy=naive_best_fit
Considerations
- Requires training process restart
- May reduce Paddle's memory reuse efficiency
Implementation Steps
Kubernetes Deployment
- Edit Deployment configuration
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
◦ name: paddle-container
env:
▪ name: FLAGS_allocator_strategy
value: "naive_best_fit"
- Apply configuration
kubectl apply -f updated_deployment.yaml
- Verify configuration
kubectl exec <pod-name> -- env | grep FLAGS
Bare Metal Deployment
- Set environment variable before execution
export FLAGS_allocator_strategy=naive_best_fit
python train.py
- Or set in Python code
import os
os.environ['FLAGS_allocator_strategy'] = 'naive_best_fit'
Verification Methods
- Check allocation strategy confirmation in logs
I0715 14:25:17.112233 12345 allocator.cc:256]
Using Naive Best Fit allocation strategy
- Monitor memory allocation continuity
nvidia-smi --query-gpu=memory.used --format=csv -l 1
- Stress test validation
# Continuous allocation test script
import paddle
for i in range(10):
data = paddle.randn([1024, 1024, 100], dtype='float32')
print(f"Allocated {i+1}GB")
Preventive Measures
-
Version Compatibility Check
Review Paddle release notes for memory allocation changes during upgrades
-
Monitoring Configuration
Add Prometheus alert rule:
• alert: GPUAllocConflict
expr: rate(paddle_gpu_malloc_failed_total[5m]) > 0
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "GPU Memory Allocation Conflict Alert"
-
Baseline Testing
Perform memory allocation baseline tests for new environments:
python -c "import paddle; paddle.utils.run_check()"
Related Content
Memory Allocation Strategy Comparison
Strategy | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|
autogrow | High efficiency | Poor large-block perf |
naive_best_fit | Stable allocation | Potential fragmentation |
References
Paddle Memory Optimization Whitepaper